Doctors SPLIT – Should Older Men Get Screened?

President Biden’s recent prostate cancer diagnosis has many medical experts questioning whether men over 70 should forgo prostate cancer screening, a recommendation that could be costing lives.

At a Glance

  • The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force currently recommends against prostate cancer screening for men over 70
  • PSA blood tests can detect cancer early but may lead to overdiagnosis and unnecessary treatments with serious side effects
  • Some experts argue healthy men over 70 should still be screened, while others support more personalized approaches
  • New techniques like MRI imaging and active surveillance are helping reduce unnecessary treatments
  • Men with risk factors like family history or African American heritage may benefit from earlier and continued screening

Current Guidelines Under Scrutiny

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) currently advises men aged 55 to 69 to discuss PSA screening with their doctor while recommending men over 70 skip such screenings entirely. This guidance, classified as Grade C for the 55-69 age group, suggests only a small potential benefit. However, President Biden’s recent diagnosis with prostate cancer has prompted renewed debate about whether these guidelines are too restrictive, potentially missing treatable cancers in older men who remain in good health and have longer life expectancies.

The PSA blood test measures prostate-specific antigen levels, which can indicate cancer but also can rise due to benign conditions like prostate enlargement or inflammation. This has led to concerns about overdiagnosis and subsequent overtreatment, particularly in older men where the slow-growing nature of many prostate cancers means they might never cause symptoms before the patient dies of other causes.

Medical Experts Divided

Some medical professionals strongly disagree with the current guidance restricting screening for men over 70. Fox News medical analyst Dr. Marc Siegel has voiced criticism of these recommendations, arguing they could lead to preventable deaths. He advocates for PSA screening for all men over 45, regardless of age, citing improvements in treatment options that now have fewer side effects than in the past.

Other experts take a more nuanced position. Dr. Shawn Dason notes that screening recommendations should consider individual circumstances. “There’s a ‘little bit of variability’ in whether men under age 50 and over 70 should be screened due to potential risks, which can include over-treatment or unnecessary treatment,” says Dason. This position acknowledges that men in good health over 70 may benefit from continued screening, while those with significant health issues might face more harm than benefit from the testing and potential treatments.

The Risks of Overtreatment

The cautious approach to PSA screening stems from legitimate concerns about the consequences of overtreatment. Treatments for prostate cancer can lead to serious side effects, including urinary incontinence, erectile dysfunction, and bowel problems. These quality-of-life issues can be particularly significant for older men. When a slow-growing cancer might never have caused symptoms during a man’s remaining lifespan, subjecting him to these side effects represents harm without benefit.

Elevated PSA levels don’t always indicate cancer, leading to unnecessary biopsies and anxiety. Even when cancer is found, distinguishing aggressive cancers from indolent ones that will never cause problems remains challenging. This uncertainty has contributed to the fluctuating guidelines over the years, causing confusion for both patients and healthcare providers trying to make informed decisions about screening.

Evolving Approaches to Screening

Medical practice is evolving toward more personalized approaches to prostate cancer screening. Doctors now consider individual risk factors, including family history of prostate cancer and African American heritage, which are associated with higher risk. Some specialists advocate for tailored screening programs that account for these factors rather than relying solely on age-based recommendations. This risk-stratified approach aims to maximize benefits for those most likely to develop aggressive disease.

New technological approaches are also helping reduce unnecessary treatments. MRI imaging can help determine which elevated PSA results warrant biopsy. For low-risk prostate cancers, active surveillance rather than immediate treatment has become more common, allowing doctors to monitor the cancer while avoiding or delaying treatment until necessary. These advances help address the overtreatment concerns that led to restrictive screening guidelines in the first place.

Making Informed Decisions

For men approaching or beyond age 70, the decision about prostate cancer screening should involve careful consultation with healthcare providers. Factors to consider include overall health status, life expectancy, family history, personal values, and preferences regarding potential treatment side effects. This shared decision-making process, though sometimes challenging, remains the best approach to balancing the potential benefits of early detection against the risks of unnecessary treatments.

President Biden’s diagnosis serves as a reminder that prostate cancer remains a significant health concern for men of all ages. As medical understanding and treatment options continue to advance, the recommendations for screening will likely continue to evolve. What remains constant is the importance of informed, individualized healthcare decisions that respect both the scientific evidence and personal circumstances of each patient.

Popular

More like this
Related

Big Pharma’s QUIZ SCAM Is Making You SICK!

Drug manufacturers are orchestrating a hidden takeover of medical...

90 Days to TRADE CHAOS—Who Blinks FIRST?

The U.S.–China trade standoff has morphed into a rare-earth...

Calling White Women ‘Karen’ RISKS RACISM!

The term "Karen," originally used to describe entitled, often...

STERILIZATION HORROR – Men Coerced Under Dictatorship!

In the 1975–77 Emergency, India’s government forcibly sterilised over...