New York City is heading toward a high-stakes experiment that should concern anyone who cares about safe streets and functional cities. Incoming Mayor Zohran Mamdani has vowed to immediately halt the controversial, multi-agency “sweeps” of homeless encampments, shifting responsibility away from the NYPD to a new Department of Community Safety. This radical move is colliding with fierce warnings from outgoing Mayor Eric Adams and Governor Kathy Hochul, who caution that ending the cleanups will create a “quality-of-life nightmare” and threaten public order. The policy clash is fueled by local investigations, which show Adams’s costly sweeps—over $6.4 million spent on 4,100 operations since 2024—have largely failed to move a single person into permanent housing.
Story Snapshot
- Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani vows to end New York City’s homeless encampment “sweeps” as soon as he takes office.
- Outgoing Mayor Eric Adams warns the move will create a “quality-of-life nightmare” for already-strained neighborhoods.
- Investigations show sweeps cost millions yet barely move anyone into shelters, let alone permanent housing.
- Governor Kathy Hochul and city watchdogs are pressing for safety, accountability, and real results, not slogans.
Adams, Mamdani, And The Future Of New York’s Streets
New York City is heading toward a high-stakes experiment that should concern anyone who cares about safe streets and functional cities. Since 2022, Mayor Eric Adams has ordered multi-agency operations to clear homeless encampments that popped up under bridges, near schools, and along busy sidewalks. Police, sanitation, parks workers, and outreach teams dismantled tent sites and offered shelter placements while arguing that sidewalk shantytowns are unsafe, undignified, and unacceptable in a major American city.
Those operations are now directly in the crosshairs of incoming Mayor Zohran Mamdani, a self-described progressive who campaigned on ending what he and his allies call “criminalization” of homelessness. He has promised that on day one in 2026, he will halt encampment sweeps and shift responsibility for homelessness away from the NYPD to a new Department of Community Safety. His message is that tents on sidewalks are a policy failure that should be met with housing subsidies and social services, not cleanups.
Costly Sweeps, Weak Results, And A Deepening Divide
Adams’ critics point to hard numbers that would infuriate any taxpayer worried about waste in blue cities. Local investigations found that since 2024, the cityhas conducted more than 4,100 encampment sweeps, spending over $6.4 million, yet failed to place a single person into permanent or supportive housing. Out of an estimated 3,500 people forced out of camps, only about 114 accepted shelter. Many sites were cleared repeatedly, logged as “previously removed,” suggesting a revolving door of displacement instead of durable solutions.
City Comptroller Brad Lander, no conservative, reviewed the program and still concluded it had “limited success,” urging officials to reassess whether simply moving people along is worth the cost. His audit pointed to familiar problems many readers will recognize from other liberal cities: unsafe and chaotic shelters, mental health and addiction issues, and deep distrust of short-term fixes. Despite this, the Adams administration defended the sweeps as an expression of compassion and civic order, insisting that allowing encampments to fester would abandon both residents and the homeless to dangerous conditions.
Quality Of Life, Public Safety, And Political Crossfire
When Mamdani announced he would immediately end sweeps, Adams responded with a warning that sounded like something many Trump-era voters have been saying about big cities for years. He argued that halting encampment cleanups would create a “quality-of-life nightmare” and called the move a “disgrace,” saying it insults the idea of real progress. In his view, showing compassion includes insisting people cannot sleep in makeshift camps near schools, parks, and transit hubs while families and commuters navigate trash, needles, and open-air disorder.
Governor Kathy Hochul, a Democrat, has also broken with Mamdani on this point, signaling that even in deep-blue New York there are limits to how far ideological experiments can go before public order and tourism suffer. Yet Mamdani and many advocacy groups counter that if a policy does not connect people to housing, it cannot honestly be labeled a success. He argues homelessness reflects political choices about housing, mental health, and spending priorities, and promises a “housing-first” strategy that leans less on police and more on new programs.
What Comes Next For Taxpayers, Neighborhoods, And The Homeless
For now, sweeps continue under Adams, with hundreds of operations recorded in recent quarterly reports and still no transition to permanent housing for people living in tents. The incoming administration has not released a detailed operational plan explaining how it will respond when residents call about a camp outside their child’s school once sweeps stop. Agencies like the Department of Homeless Services will be tasked with turning broad rhetoric about dignity and housing into practical steps, while neighborhoods brace for the possibility of larger and more entrenched encampments.
Watch the report: Mamdani plans to end destruction of homeless encampments in NYC
Sources: