President Trump has signaled that Chicago could be the next target for a federal crime crackdown following his intervention in Washington, D.C., prompting sharp rebuke from Illinois leaders.
At a Glance
- Trump said Chicago is “a mess” and may follow D.C. in federal takeover
- Similar measures might be extended to New York and other cities
- Local officials say crime is declining and oppose military-style intervention
- Critics warn such actions may breach legal limits and undermine local control
Chicago in the Crosshairs
President Trump announced his administration might bring a federal-style crackdown to Chicago, branding the city “a mess” in remarks from the White House. He suggested that Chicago could be targeted next after Washington, D.C., and hinted at expanding efforts to include New York.
Watch now: President Trump says Chicago is likely next target of efforts to crack down on crime · YouTube
Meanwhile, officials in Chicago note that crime has actually dropped significantly in recent years and argue that federal military involvement is not warranted.
Opposition from Local Leaders
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson responded forcefully, calling the idea “uncoordinated, uncalled for, and unsound,” emphasizing the city’s success in reducing violent crime through community-focused strategies. Legal experts have questioned the constitutionality of deploying troops or federal agents in cities outside the unique federal jurisdiction of Washington, D.C.
The mayor insisted Chicago would resist efforts to override local policing decisions, adding that Trump’s comments were politically motivated. Illinois leaders have vowed to challenge any attempt at federal intervention in court.
Broader Context and Legal Stakes
Trump’s approach mirrors what he has already undertaken in D.C., where he invoked the Home Rule Act to federalize local policing and deploy troops. Critics say this move blurs lines of federal authority and could set a precedent for undermining local governance.
Meanwhile, a federal judge recently ruled against the administration’s attempt to defund sanctuary cities—including Chicago—spotlighting intensifying legal battles over federal versus municipal control. Analysts say these disputes may escalate into a wider constitutional clash if Trump expands his strategy to multiple cities.