Congress Turns Spotlight On Foreign University Funding

Pruned plane trees line a brick walkway with a modern apartment building behind — Photo: James Kirkikis / Shutterstock

New federal data shows American universities quietly took more than $300 million from sanctioned Chinese entities, raising hard questions about secrecy, security, and who our schools really serve.

Story Snapshot

Dozens of U.S. universities received about $309 million from Chinese entities now on U.S. sanctions or restriction lists.
The University of California, Berkeley alone reported more than $87 million from entities later sanctioned, including over $25 million from Chinese organizations.
The Education Department is probing four elite schools over foreign funding disclosures, after universities hid or reported late more than $2 billion in overseas money.
Congressional and agency reports warn that Chinese government-linked money often comes with “strings” that threaten transparency and academic freedom.

Sanctioned Money Flowing Into American Campuses

Newsweek obtained a federal spreadsheet titled “Counterparties of Concern” that tracks foreign donations to American universities from entities now sanctioned by the United States. The data lists 697 donations totaling about $405 million from foreign organizations in China, Russia, Serbia, and Israel. Of that total, roughly $309 million came from Chinese entities that later landed on sanctions or restricted-party lists. These are not small side gifts; they represent serious money shaping research and programs on U.S. campuses.

The spreadsheet includes 156 donations from Chinese technology giant Huawei and its U.S. subsidiary FutureWei to American universities, together worth about $42 million. Huawei has long been treated by U.S. national security officials as a high-risk firm because of its ties to the Chinese state and concerns about espionage. The list also captures other Chinese universities and companies now restricted by Washington, showing how deeply they have woven into our higher education system over years.

Berkeley and Other Elite Schools Under Federal Scrutiny

The University of California, Berkeley stands out in the new data, with more than $87 million received from entities that later appeared on sanctions or restriction lists. Over $25 million of that total came from Chinese organizations. Separate reporting shows Berkeley also took $220 million from Chinese governmental sources for the Tsinghua-Berkeley Institute in Shenzhen, without initially reporting it under Section 117’s foreign funding rules. That undisclosed funding helped trigger a Department of Education investigation into Berkeley’s reporting practices.

Berkeley is not alone. Federal officials have opened Section 117 investigations into Harvard University, the University of Pennsylvania, the University of California, Berkeley, and the University of Michigan for inaccurate or late foreign funding disclosures. Between February and December 2025, American universities reported more than $2 billion in foreign gifts and contracts late, in direct violation of federal law. In response, the Department of Education has revived a dedicated foreign funding enforcement office and launched new oversight actions.

A Long Pattern of Hidden Foreign Influence

This latest China-focused story sits on top of a decade of wider failure by universities to follow foreign money disclosure laws. Section 117 of the Higher Education Act requires schools that receive federal funds to report any foreign gift or contract worth at least $250,000 in a calendar year. A Trump-era enforcement push found more than $6.5 billion in previously undisclosed foreign funds, much of it from authoritarian regimes such as China, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia.

A Senate investigation found that nearly 70 percent of colleges receiving Chinese-government money for Confucius Institutes never reported those donations, despite the legal requirement. One Education Department letter to Congress described foreign government spending on U.S. schools as “effectively a black hole” because universities repeatedly failed to report as required. These findings undercut claims that missing reports are rare mistakes; they point to a system that chose foreign cash over full transparency.

National Security Fears and Academic Freedom at Risk

Federal officials and security experts warn that Chinese government-linked funding is not just generous support; it often comes with strings attached. The November 2019 Education Department letter to the Senate said the communist Chinese government invests “strategically” in U.S. education, and that hidden money can compromise academic freedom. Beijing’s spending has focused on language centers, joint labs, and research partnerships that touch sensitive science and technology areas.

US Universities Got Over $300M From Sanctioned China Entities

Spooked by a decades-long outflow of American science and technology to adversaries, the Department of Education disclosed new data revealing 527 donations to U.S. universities from currently sanctioned Chinese…

— Spotlight on China (@spotlightoncn) July 20, 2026

When universities sign contracts with sanctioned or high-risk entities, they raise the chance that U.S. taxpayer-backed labs will train foreign engineers, share dual-use research, or help adversaries leap ahead in fields like chips and artificial intelligence. Reports have already flagged American programs that educated large numbers of Chinese chip engineers with U.S.-linked resources. With China now racing to beat the United States in advanced AI and semiconductors, Washington is asking whether some of that edge was built inside our own universities.

Trump Administration’s Push for Tougher Oversight

The renewed focus on sanctioned donors reflects a broader Trump administration effort to close the foreign funding loophole in higher education. Since 2025, the Department of Education has launched new investigations, expanded data releases, and backed calls for “robust enforcement” of Section 117 by both the Education Department and the Department of Justice. A recent executive order directs agencies to track and police risky foreign ties in universities more aggressively.

Conservative policy groups argue that every dollar from foreign entities that may threaten American interests should be subject to strict disclosure and limits. They warn that letting universities quietly partner with sanctioned firms and state-directed programs erodes U.S. sovereignty, drains our scientific edge, and exposes students and faculty to influence campaigns. For many Americans already frustrated by globalist priorities and lax border security, the idea that universities took hundreds of millions from sanctioned Chinese entities feels like one more elite betrayal.